One way to do this is to look for words that signal conclusions, like "so" and "therefore," and words that signal premises like "because" and "if." Another way is to ask yourself which part of the argument follows from the rest. To master the logical reasoning section, you need to be able to spot conclusions flawlessly. Confusing conclusions with premises is a common pitfall. The parts of the argument that lead to the conclusion are the premises. In the examples cited earlier, they are: "I had a great hike last weekend." "My sister will become a concert pianist." "I should not have eaten the whole pizza." To work with an argument, you need to understand the function of each of its parts.Įvery complete argument has a conclusion. Practice methodically to identify your weak points.īreak Down an Argument Into Its Component PartsĪlmost every kind of question on the logical reasoning section presents a logical argument and asks you to do something to it, like strengthen it, find its flaw or compare it to another argument.
#Lsat logical reasoning practice how to#
Know how to approach different question types. Break down an argument into its component parts.
Like the rest of the test, logical reasoning can be mastered through practice - with the right plan and study habits.
Overlooking or misunderstanding one word in an argument can make all the difference between a right and wrong answer.įortunately, the questions on the logical reasoning section follow similar patterns. High performance requires skill and sustained focus. The section's fast pace and tricky phrasing make it difficult.
This is the ability tested by the logical reasoning section on the LSAT. Lawyers love to pick apart arguments to see how they work the way engineers deconstruct machines and football coaches analyze plays.
0 kommentar(er)
